It would be great to add tasks to a story
Is there a way to add tasks to a story?
This way the product team can break down stories into actionable items they can work on.
I'd really love to be able to use this for my daily scrum meetings but I can't when the developers can't break their stuff down to tasks.
This way the product team can break down stories into actionable items they can work on.
I'd really love to be able to use this for my daily scrum meetings but I can't when the developers can't break their stuff down to tasks.
81
people like this idea
I like this idea!
Tell me when this idea gets some attention.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The company implemented this idea.
The best points from the company
-
Story tasks are coming in one of the next releases...working on visual design now.
4 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Thanks for the feedback. We're considering adding an optional task list to stories, which would allow developers to keep track of everything that needs to be done to complete that feature. This task list would be visible when expanding a story. Prioritization, estimation, and the story completion workflow would still occur at the story level.
4 people think
this is one of the best points
The best points from everyone
-
we just completed work on this and it should be available very soon. it will be turned off by default and you can enable it for individual projects.
3 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Yes, tasks as children of stories is huge!!! 0 point chores don't really do the job for us...I need/want them to be related to the story they are under (especially when exporting).
Adding an "Hours" field to the task would be nice, even if it has no relationship to the points for the story (which I think would be too hard to pull off easily). I know if an "Hours" field does not exist, we and many others will end up putting it in the task's title or comment.
I second the good to great comment above.
3 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Second that. In my opinion, this is the one feature that is holding this good app from becoming truly great.
1 person thinks
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Please please add this feature asap
-
Inappropriate?Thanks for the feedback. We're considering adding an optional task list to stories, which would allow developers to keep track of everything that needs to be done to complete that feature. This task list would be visible when expanding a story. Prioritization, estimation, and the story completion workflow would still occur at the story level.
4 people think
this is one of the best points
-
What I'd really like to see:
- I can make tasks/chores children of features
- I can estimate features
- I can estimate tasks/chores (either is fine w/me)
- if I estimate *any* tasks/chores under a feature, the feature size reflects the sum of all children
- if I *don't* estimate any children, I can still use the feature-level estimation as normal
- should still keep the original feature est around as reference only (can maybe track "how good are your estimates" in the future)
- BONUS (priority #2): A task can be a child of multiple stories. It rolls up to all parents until *any* parent is complete, then it does not
- this allows clean & easy management of tasks that must be done before any one of many features can be completed
Thx! - Bruce -
Inappropriate?We are currently solving this by making user stories be Features, which get points estimated. Only the product mgr can create stories. And stories are limited to things which a QA person can validate via the UI - a backend capability is not a Feature until someone can use it for something.
Then the subtasks to implement that Feature are created as Chores, which get 0 points. Developers can extract as many of those as they like. Again, no points for progress, only for finishing the Feature. That also encourages user stories to be small, lest the team work for days and get 0 points because they're still chipping away at an epic story.
There is no tracking of dependency, so we have to manually sort and remember that. It would be handy if stories could have interdependence, so that you could push the must-do-first tasks to the top and eventually close enough of them that you could finally Finish the actual top-level Feature that people actually are asking for.
I’m sorta interested in this
-
Inappropriate?Yes, tasks as children of stories is huge!!! 0 point chores don't really do the job for us...I need/want them to be related to the story they are under (especially when exporting).
Adding an "Hours" field to the task would be nice, even if it has no relationship to the points for the story (which I think would be too hard to pull off easily). I know if an "Hours" field does not exist, we and many others will end up putting it in the task's title or comment.
I second the good to great comment above.
3 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?+1. We have many stories that are too big in scope to be scheduled as a single task. Other stories require work to be completed by two or more different engineers on our team (that is, our engineers are not perfectly fungible).
-
Inappropriate?Love that too - would keep us from sliming the backlog with many chores that serve the same purpose. Thing with those is that the tasks get quickly disconnected from the feature when you start them.
-
Inappropriate?Please do not add this feature or make it an option. We are so happy to have a small tool to track stories and use note cards for the tasks. It is one of the best thinks about pivotal tracker to have small tool for all this without task and hour tracking.
-
Inappropriate?About what klaas Prause said, maybe if this is implemented it can be turn on and off on a Project by Project basis
-
Inappropriate?@Klass Prause: If you don't estimate and track tasks, how is your daily burndown chart useful or are your stories so small that they can be completed in a day?
-
I did not make myself clear:
We are using pivotal for our backlog tracking our development teams. Each team uses a wall with index cards to track tasks and progress in their current iteration. Each task has it's estimates in hours just imagine a normal SCRUM wall. Additionally the team has the burn down for the current sprint on a whiteboard.
Pivotal is our big tracking tool only used for planning in a larger scheme, the teams are not using it for their daily work. Just for seeing whats up next and for estimating of new stories. -
Inappropriate?Absolutely needed to have tasks under stories. Currently using http://scrumy.com (they have tasks under stories which can be dragged from To-Do, to in progress to Verify to Done) but wanting to switch to Pivotal 100%.
I’m frustrated
2 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?+10 (as in every member of our dev team.)
Please add this! :) -
Inappropriate?More +++. We currently use chores for tasks, but it's a pain if you have to move a whole group of them without having dependencies on the parent story.
1 person thinks
this is one of the best points
-
Chores don't relate to velocity. -
Inappropriate?We'd love this as well!
-
Inappropriate?I think this would be a very helpful 'feature'. I realize that stories shouldn't be so big as to require a lot of 'to-dos' but in our work-flow they often do.
What frequently happens is the functionality is working but the UI needs improvement. Rather then restarting all the stories that require UI improvements, it seems this would be a happy medium.
Ideally, I would like 'Current' to be broken into two sections: Functionality and Design. Often this happens simultaneously, but not with all of our programmers : ) -
Inappropriate?I'd love to have this feature. My solution so far: in the story description write out each task. As each is completed, edit the description and add a big (DONE) in front of the task. Easy!
-
Inappropriate?I like Jonathan's take. We've done something similar, but indeed a simple "todo" list assigned to the stories would be awesome.
TODOs (tasks( would have a team member assigned and a checkbox to mark when "done"... I dont think even the scrum master should be nofitied when its done, they just mind more about the story itself. -
Inappropriate?Story tasks are coming in one of the next releases...working on visual design now.
4 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Nice!
-
Inappropriate?Hey danp! Any news on this? We're very excited to see Tasks!
-
Inappropriate?Do you happen to have an ETA on 'tasks'. We are evaluation a few different products. If Tracker had the concept of tasks, I think we would start using it immediately.
2 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Any news? Acunote is driving our team crazy! Subtasks are the only feature that prevents us shifting back :(
I’m anxious
-
Oh how we would love this... -
Inappropriate?Guys in the meantime here is how we're dealing with this. We make sure we break our stories to functional areas. So we really never have a story point of 8 anymore. You only see 2,3 and 5's in our project. We treat these smaller stories as tasks and label them with the name of the overarching story. So if there is a story of "Implement X functionality", we break that into three stories say "Write DB stored procs", "Code business rules", "Design user interface" and apply "Implement X functionality" label to all three . We also label each of those stories with the developer name so you can later search for developer labels and story labels. The labels are extremely powerful in Pivotal. Not missing the task level entries that much at the moment.
-
Inappropriate?we just completed work on this and it should be available very soon. it will be turned off by default and you can enable it for individual projects.
3 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Great!!! I am anxious to see the result.
Loading Profile...





EMPLOYEE






